影片库

自从妻子去世后，萨姆（汤姆·汉克斯 Tom Hanks饰）就相信自己此生的爱已经走到了尽头，不会再有新的恋情走进心中，他在西雅图和儿子乔纳一起平静的生活。而乔纳，却一直希望爸爸能够开始新的婚姻，重获生活的阳光。　　抱着这样的想法，乔纳在圣诞夜打电话到电台的情感热线。就这样，萨姆的经历在此夜传遍了各个角落，很多人在倾听他的故事，其中包括安妮（梅格·瑞安 Meg Ryan饰）——一个住在东部的女记者。她善良，温柔，有一个知心的好友，和一个即将结婚的男友。然而，幸福的生活就被这个电话彻底打破了。她的内心有一种冲动，让她一步步地接近这个远在西部的男人。　　然而，一次次辗转的错过让萨姆和安妮迟迟不能会面。屡次在缘份的天空下失诸交臂的二人，一直为爱而奔波，等待一个遇见的机缘。

戴夫·柯维在长相上酷似新任美国总统米切尔。一天，米切尔在与女秘做爱时，突然中风，昏迷不醒。白宫幕僚长鲍勃让戴夫冒统总统，以伺机夺位。谁知在戴夫当总统期间，勤政爱民，大力推动改革法案，鲍勃盛怒之下，揭发米切尔政府贪污内幕。戴夫为保荐副总统顺利接任，在议会上演出了一幕最精彩的中风……

故事紧接着上一集发展，小狗贝多芬和露西终于走到了一起，过上了幸福的生活，露西还为贝多芬生下了四只可爱的小狗，一家人其乐融融。然而，这四只小狗崽却让孩子们陷入了烦恼之中，如果让爸爸知道家里一下子多了这四个小家伙，那还不非得翻了天不可。　　虽然挨了老爸一顿臭骂，但善良的布鲁诺先生（凯文·杜恩 Kevin Dunn 饰）还是收留了贝多芬和露西的孩子们，一家人前往宁静的小村开始了悠闲的度假。然而他们并不知道的是，布鲁诺的前妻瑞吉娜（黛比·玛扎 Debi Mazar 饰）早已经盯上了小狗崽们，她想将它们偷到手，卖掉大赚一笔。得知此事的贝多芬率先行动，带领妻儿躲到了山中，瑞吉娜紧随其后。

邦尼（艾丹•奎因 Aidan Quinn 饰）在汽车修理厂工作。他有一个智障的妹妹琼（玛丽•斯图尔特•马斯特森 Mary Stuart Masterson 饰）令他非常操心。为了照顾妹妹，邦尼一直单身，因为他不想把琼送到专门的疗养院。某一天，邦尼和琼遇到了一个不速之客——邦尼朋友的远房亲戚萨姆（约翰尼•德普 Johnny Depp 饰）。这个萨姆行为古怪，他在酒吧里可以用面包玩出花样，还会模仿经典影片的桥段，逗大家开心。于是，邦尼邀请他做自己妹妹的保姆。在相处中，两个年轻人渐渐建立了一种特殊的感情。同时，邦尼也遇到了心上人路西（朱丽安•摩尔 Julianne Moore 饰），但是对妹妹的责任感让他对这段恋情有所忌惮。或许是出于对妹妹的爱，他拒绝萨姆的请求，结果萨姆带着琼私奔了。但是，因为改变环境，琼开始发疯，她被强制送进了医院……

Sam (Matthew Broderick) is the reasonable man in a crazy urban world, the man of thoughtfulness and refined taste in a landscape of Leroy Neiman paintings and beer commercials. The guy would sooner cook for an hour over a hot stove than say `supersize it.'　　By day he's a store clerk in an upscale gourmet eatery, and these scenes raise a smile, especially for anyone who's visited the actual chain in New York City -- the portrayal isn't far off from the reality. Our man is besieged by hoards of customers who want their imported French cheese cut to impossibly exact standards. His efforts to remain outwardly polite (while you know he'd like to take the cleaver to the relentless clientele) are pretty funny, and will warm the hearts of clerks everywhere. In general, Broderick is in good form and provides the movie with most of whatever lightness it possesses.　　Sciorra's lovelorn dental hygienist, Ellen, is fine enough, too, and her unknowing interaction with our cheese-slicing hero shows some hopeful chemistry, and you may begin to feel you want to see these two get together.　　One of the main competitors for our lady's affections, a stockbroker (Kevin Anderson), is played as caricature he's the beer swilling frat-boy whose idea of after-sex sensitivity is flipping on the football game. He's kind of funny at times, but the movie might be stronger if he was written or acted for us to like him more, instead of having us merely recognize him as the flat-out `wrong' guy in comparison to Broderick's sensitive man. Think of John Candy in Splash, taking a cigarette and beer can to the racquetball game; we know his lifestyle is not the one our hero should emulate, but we can't help but be charmed by the likeable goon. Whereas this character is merely a goon, and pretty unlikable all around.　　While it's a nice enough light movie for the first half, for me the story was somewhat derailed by its unbelievable (Hollywood) presentation of sex and adultery. (SPOILER AHEAD, skip to next paragraph.) When Ellen returns home after an evening's misadventures, she is naturally faced with the questioning husband (Michael Mantell). Quickly admitting her own indiscretion, she then immediately turns the situation around, demanding to know why the guy had gone ahead and bought a house without discussing it. Granted, it's a valid issue, and granted, many people use this countering maneuver in arguments. What's unbelievable is what happens next the guy starts responding to her question, addressing the house-issue in a quiet, thoughtful manner. WHOA. You'd be hard pressed to find a married person in the world who, when faced with hisher partner's totally unexpected adultery, would be ready to address anything so calmly. The guy would surely be bouncing off the walls, or else crushed into silence and tears - but see, then we might actually feel for the poor schnook, and we'd see Sciorra's character in a poor light. And since that particular audience reaction doesn't serve the romantic comedy, the story tries to sneak around it. You may start to feel that, like the husband, you're being taken.　　Further dissatisfaction is just around the corner in the ending. We realize this is where misunderstandings will get sorted out, and our couple will finally see a clear path to one another. We want the satisfaction of rooting for them. But it's marred by another unbelievable character reaction, followed by an abrupt conclusion that feels rushed and forced, too easy and unearned. You may feel as though the movie's cheating on you again...